Rep. George Santos becomes only the 6th Congress member in U.S. history to be expelled from his job by colleagues

William of England
By William of England 6 Min Read

The vote to expel was 311-114. Expulsion requires help from two-thirds of the House, a purposefully excessive bar, however a blistering House Ethics Committee report that accused Santos of breaking federal regulation proved decisive.

As it turned clear that he would be expelled, Santos positioned his overcoat over his shoulders, shook arms with conservative members who voted in opposition to his expulsion and departed the House chamber.

House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., quickly took the gavel, quieted the chamber and solemnly instructed the House clerk to inform the governor of New York that Santos’ former House seat was now vacant.

Santos had fought the expulsion effort, main his personal protection throughout House flooring debate and in conducting a information convention and interviews.

‘You’re going to have to go silence these folks’

“I will not stand by quietly,” Santos declared as lawmakers on Thursday night debated his elimination. “The people of the Third District of New York sent me here. If they want me out, you’re going to have to go silence those people and go take the hard vote.”

Of the earlier expulsions in the House, three had been for disloyalty to the Union throughout the Civil War. The remaining two occurred after the lawmakers had been convicted of crimes in federal courtroom. Santos made his case for remaining in workplace by interesting straight to lawmakers who fear they’re setting a brand new precedent that would make expulsions extra frequent.

Johnson was amongst those that voiced considerations about eradicating Santos, although he has advised members to vote their conscience. Others in management agreed with his reasoning and opposed expulsion. But some Republicans, together with Santos’ colleagues from New York, mentioned voters would welcome lawmakers being held to the next commonplace.

“I’m pretty confident the American people would applaud that. I’m pretty confident that the American people expect that,” Republican Rep. Anthony D’Esposito, whose district adjoins Santos’, mentioned earlier than the vote.

Santos warned lawmakers they’d remorse eradicating a member earlier than they’ve had their day in courtroom.

“This will haunt them in the future where mere allegations are sufficient to have members removed from office when duly elected by their people in their respective states and districts,” Santos mentioned.

A cascade of lies, then an indictment

The expulsion was the ultimate congressional chapter in what was a spectacular fall from grace for Santos. The first-term lawmaker initially was celebrated as an up-and-comer after he flipped a district from Democrats final yr and helped Republicans win management of the House. But quickly after, troubles started. Reports began to emerge that Santos had lied about having Jewish ancestry, a profession at high Wall Street corporations and a school diploma. His presence in the House rapidly turned a distraction and a humiliation to the social gathering.

In early March, the House Ethics Committee introduced it was launching an investigation into Santos. Then in May, the U.S. legal professional’s workplace for the Eastern District of New York indicted Santos, accusing him of duping donors, stealing from his marketing campaign and mendacity to Congress. Prosecutors would later add extra costs in an up to date 23-count indictment.

The indictment alleges he stole the identities of marketing campaign donors after which used their bank cards to make tens of 1000’s of {dollars} in unauthorized costs. Federal prosecutors say Santos, who has pleaded not guilty, wired a few of the cash to his private checking account and used the relaxation to pad his marketing campaign coffers.

Meanwhile, Ethics Committee investigators spent eight months investigating Santos and interviewing witnesses. When their work was full, the panel mentioned it had amassed “overwhelming evidence” of lawbreaking by Santos that it despatched to the Justice Department.

Among different issues, the committee mentioned Santos knowingly induced his marketing campaign committee to file false or incomplete experiences with the Federal Election Commission, used marketing campaign funds for private functions and violated the Ethics in Government Act with his monetary disclosure statements.

Arguing in opposition to expulsion throughout debate on Thursday, Rep. Clay Higgins, R-La., mentioned that whereas he revered the committee, he had considerations about how the Santos case was dealt with. He mentioned he was troubled {that a} Republican-led committee would submit a report that was so judgmental and publicized.

“The totality of circumstance appears biased,” Higgins mentioned. “It stinks of politics and I’ll oppose this action in every way.”

While the committee does have a Republican chairman, its membership is evenly divided. Rep. Susan Wild, the high Democrat on the committee, reminded members that the determination approving the investigators’ findings was unanimous.

“As the Ethics Committee’s report lays out in thorough detail, Mr. Santos has repeatedly, egregiously and brazenly violated the public’s trust,” Wild mentioned. “Mr. Santos is not a victim. He is a perpetrator of a massive fraud on his constituents and the American people.”


Associated Press employees author Farnoush Amiri contributed to this report.

Share This Article
Leave a comment