Prince Harry visa application answers on drug use ‘private personal information’

RockedBuzz
By RockedBuzz 4 Min Read

The Heritage Foundation introduced the lawsuit towards the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) after a Freedom of Information Act request was denied – claiming there was an “overwhelming public curiosity”.

Prince Harry

Prince Harry

Prince Harry’s visa application responses relating to previous drug use shouldn’t be disclosed as a result of it’s “non-public personal data”, attorneys for the US Department of Homeland Security mentioned.

The Duke of Sussex’s reference to taking cocaine, marijuana and psychedelic mushrooms in his memoir Spare has prompted a conservative Washington DC assume tank to query why he was allowed into the US in 2020.

The Heritage Foundation introduced the lawsuit towards the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) after a Freedom of Information Act request was denied – claiming there was an “overwhelming public curiosity”.

In response to the assume tank’s submissions that Harry’s US visa application ought to be dropped, attorneys for the DHS mentioned the Heritage Foundation “has not demonstrated potential authorities misconduct or some other public curiosity that might override Prince Harry’s privateness curiosity within the information this”.

The DHS additionally mentioned that whereas the duke is a “public official” within the United Kingdom, he’s “not a public official within the United States.”

Their submissions to the courtroom mentioned the DHS “has offered the utmost quantity of data it could relating to the information in its possession” with out disclosing Harry’s immigration standing.

In his controversial memoir, the cocaine duke mentioned “It did not do something for me”, including: “Marijuana is completely different, which helped me so much.”

Join the Daily Record WhatsApp neighborhood right here and get the newest information straight to your inbox.

The Heritage Foundation’s attorneys argue that US regulation “typically makes such an individual inadmissible for entry” to the nation.

In the DHS response to the authorized demand, they mentioned: “Like well being, monetary or employment data, an individual’s immigration data is non-public personal data.

“If the courtroom accepts the Plaintiffs’ arguments, the Government must disclose confidential immigration details about Prince Harry, an consequence the courtroom mustn’t settle for.”

The submissions made by lawyer John Bardo on behalf of the DHS additionally mentioned that “publicly obtainable data doesn’t point out that Prince Harry has ever been convicted of a drug-related offence.”

Mr Bardo added that any suggestion by the Heritage Foundation of wrongdoing on behalf of the US Government was “pure”.

The response from the DHS comes shortly after the duke was advised he may proceed together with his declare within the UK High Court towards Mirror Group Newspapers over alleged unlawful intelligence gathering.

In the UK authorized motion, Harry is accusing the writer of finishing up or commissioning unlawful actions resembling hiring non-public investigators to plant listening gadgets inside vehicles, “blagging” non-public information and accessing non-public phone conversations and recording them.

Source

Share This Article
Leave a comment