Man wrongfully jailed for 17 years now ‘broke’ and ‘living in a tent’

By RockedBuzz 5 Min Read

Andrew Malkinson, who spent 17 years in prison for a rape he did not commit, outside the Royal Courts of Justice in London, after being cleared by the Court of Appeal.  Picture date: Wednesday July 26, 2023. PA Photo.  Mr Malkinson, 57, was found guilty of raping a woman in Greater Manchester in 2003 and the following year was jailed for life with a minimum term of seven years.  Picture date: Wednesday July 26, 2023. PA Photo.  See PA COURTS Malkinson story.  Photo credit should be as follows: Jordan Pettitt/PA Wire

Andrew Malkinson spent 17 years in jail for a rape he didn’t commit (Picture: PA)

A person who was jailed for 17 years after being wrongly convicted of rape says he’s now ‘damaged’ and dwelling in a tent in Spain.

Andrew Malkinson, then 37, was falsely convicted of raping a girl whereas working as a safety guard in Salford, Greater Manchester, in 2003.

The 57-year-old might have been launched after six-and-a-half years if he had given a false confession – however refused to plead responsible to a crime he didn’t commit.

Mr Malkinson was lastly launched in July this yr after the Court of Appeal overturned his conviction, after discovering that important data had been withheld by Greater Manchester Police throughout his trial.

Andrew Malkinson Holland 3 August 2023 Credit APPEAL Image courtesy of

After his launch, Andrew has been touring Europe and now lives in a tent in Seville (Picture: Appeal)

Since his launch, he has since traveled to Amsterdam to remain near a former associate, Karin Schuitemaker, who he mentioned by no means misplaced religion in his innocence.

He then went on a highway journey by Europe utilizing a good friend’s van, touring by France and Portugal earlier than touchdown in Seville, the place he presently lives in a tent on a campsite.

Living in a tent permits him to get pleasure from ‘the anonymity and nature’, mentioned Mr Malkinson, including that he can’t be in Britain.

‘This horror will at all times be with me,’ mentioned BBC Breakfast. ‘I cope with it through the use of the psychological assets I used to outlive in jail. I’m type of at warfare with the authorities, I’ve been like that because the day they kidnapped me.

‘They lied, they distorted the reality, they hid proof, that it was a warfare for me.

‘An unlawful won’t minimize it with the police. They are every thing however trustworthy. They will not give it up. They are institutionally dishonest.

‘I’ve no religion in any British authority larger than a site visitors warden. I do not belief the British, Hillsborough, Bloody Sunday – they can not face the reality.’

Mandatory Credit: Photo by Vuk Valcic/ZUMA Press Wire/Shutterstock (14022723b) Andrew Malkinson arrives at the Royal Courts of Justice to appeal to overturn his 2003 rape conviction.  Andrew was convicted of rape and served 17 years in prison despite there being no DNA evidence of the crime.  DNA evidence later came to light relating to another man.  Andrew Malkinson rape conviction appeal, London, England, United Kingdom - 26 July 2023

Andrew is due substantial compensation for his imprisonment, however he might have to attend two years to obtain it (Image: Shutterstock)

When requested if he noticed the UK as his dwelling, he mentioned ‘no,’ including ‘this isn’t my dwelling, your pals do not kidnap you do they?’

Although Mr Malkinson is to obtain substantial compensation for his wrongful imprisonment, he mentioned he has been warned it may very well be two years earlier than he receives any cash.

(*17*), Andrew mentioned he’s ‘principally homeless’ as he awaits his trial.

‘I’m on advantages. I haven’t got a job, I stay in a tent. I’m principally homeless and ready for them to do the best factor,” he mentioned.

‘They have the ability to do the best factor however they selected to take their time.’

Justice Secretary Alex Chalk revealed plans for a public inquiry into why Mr Malkinson spent nearly 20 years in jail for a crime he didn’t commit.

But the inquiry shall be extrajudicial, that means investigators can have no authorized energy to supply witnesses.

After the announcement, Mr Malkinson blamed the chancellor and mentioned he had ‘made a mistake’ by not forcing witnesses beneath the regulation to testify and disclose proof.

‘The police don’t need to reveal,’ he instructed the Guardian. ‘They by no means did and I can not see them enjoying ball except a statutory inquiry forces them to.’

‘I need to know precisely how and why [this] occur. Because I can not relaxation till I do know,’ he mentioned. ‘It is my life and the struggling is incalculable. Oceans of tears I suffered due to that. And I need to know why.’

A Ministry of Justice spokesman mentioned: ‘It was clear to the Lord Chancellor that Andrew Malkinson suffered a horrible miscarriage of justice and he deserves thorough and trustworthy solutions as to how and why it took so lengthy to reveal him.’

‘The Criminal Cases Review Commission, the Crown Prosecution Service and Greater Manchester Police have pledged their full cooperation to the unbiased inquiry into the dealing with of his conviction and subsequent appeals.’


Share This Article
Leave a comment