Elon Musk says Ilya Sutskever—the OpenAI chief scientist who helped fire Sam Altman then backtracked—should jump ship for xAI or Tesla

William of England
By William of England 5 Min Read

Last month, Sutskever joined different OpenAI board members in firing CEO Sam Altman for vague reasons, kicking off a short-lived however dramatic company saga. With assist from Microsoft and different traders, OpenAI shortly reinstated Altman and then set about revamping its board.

Altman made a degree to say Sutskever in a statement about his return, writing: “I harbor zero ill will towards him. While Ilya will no longer serve on the board, we hope to continue our working relationship.”

But on Friday, Business Insider printed a report suggesting Sutskever is in a state of limbo and has not too long ago develop into “invisible” at OpenAI. When an X consumer shared that article in a put up and wrote that Sutskever ought to be a part of Tesla, Musk replied, “or xAI.” 

yH5BAEAAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAIBRAA7OpenAI CEO Sam Altman with chief scientist Ilya Sutskever (proper).JACK GUEZ/AFP by way of Getty Images

AI recruiting battle

Musk began xAI in March and final month introduced Grok, its AI chatbot competing towards OpenAI’s ChatGPT. But if AI historical past had unfolded a bit otherwise, Musk would possibly as we speak be extra related to OpenAI. Musk helped begin, fund, and lure key expertise to OpenAI in 2015, when it launched as a nonprofit—and he persuaded Sutskever, who had been at Google, to affix OpenAI. 

“That was one of the toughest recruiting battles I’ve ever had,” Musk told the Lex Fridman Podcast. It was additionally “the key moment,” he addded, within the friendship breakup between Musk and Google cofounder Larry Page.

Musk, who had been on OpenAI’s board, left on a bitter be aware in 2018 after an influence battle. Shortly after, OpenAI, needing capital and computing sources, switched to a capped-profit mannequin and began accepting hefty investments from Microsoft.

That partnership, which antitrust authorities within the UK are actually wanting into, didn’t go over properly with Musk, who tweeted earlier this yr: “OpenAI was created as an open source (which is why I named it “Open” AI), non-profit firm to function a counterweight to Google, however now it has develop into a closed supply, maximum-profit firm successfully managed by Microsoft. Not what I meant in any respect.” 

Sutskever’s ‘moral compass’

After the OpenAI board fired Altman final month, Musk wrote, “Given the risk and power of advanced AI, the public should be informed of why the board felt they had to take such drastic action.” Musk has lengthy warned of the potential risks of AI but additionally sees its promise.

Helen Toner, an educational who was on the OpenAI board earlier than resigning after Altman’s return, not too long ago informed the Wall Street Journal that the CEO firing “wasn’t about AI safety, it was about a lack of trust.” And Sutskever himself backtracked after Altman returned, writing on X, “I deeply regret my participation in the board’s actions.”

But Musk has on a number of events highlighted Sutskever’s involvement in firing Altman, together with throughout an interview on the New York Times Dealbook summit

“I think we should be concerned about this because I think Ilya actually has a strong moral compass,” he stated. “He really sweats it over questions of what is right. And if Ilya felt strongly enough to want to fire Sam, well, I think the world should know what was that reason.”

If Sutskever had been to jump ship for xAI or Tesla—or some other agency, for that matter—it will be a serious growth within the AI expertise wars. As Musk informed the Lex Fridman Podcast, Sutskever’s recruitment in 2015 “was really the linchpin for OpenAI being successful.” 

Share This Article
Leave a comment